Kinetics of Rapid Solidification
last updated 1/12/98

In solidification the phase selection, growth velocity, chemical composition, long-range order and microstructure of a growing phase are functions of the local conditions at the crystal/melt interface, e.g. temperature, composition, orientation, curvature, crystal structure. The objective of our research is to illuminate how atomic structure and the kinetics of atom movements lead to these functions. We have taken several steps toward predictive capability for the production of materials under solidification processing and other nonequilibrium conditions.
 
 

The modeling of an alloy solidification process typically assumes local equilibrium at the crystal/melt interface. Local equilibrium is not maintained during rapid solidification, for which models of nonequilibrium interface kinetics abound but good measurements have been lacking. 
 
 

Rapid solidification following pulsed laser melting is a well-controlled experimental technique for investigating the kinetics of solidification far from local equilibrium. Pulsed laser irradiation creates on the surface of the sample a short-lived liquid layer that resolidifies, due to the high thermal gradients, at speeds measured to be as high as 15 m/sec in Si and 100 m/sec in pure elemental metals. With a spatially uniform pulsed excimer laser we constrain melting and solidification to occur in a one-dimensional geometry, permitting simple but accurate calculations and even measurements of important quantities such as interface positions and velocities, and temperature and solute depth profiles, which are usually only estimated in rapid solidification processing and other "rapid quenching" techniques. In Fig. 1 (a) shows the interface position vs. time, (b) shows the initial (ion-implanted) solute depth profile, and subsequent frames show snapshots of the profile during rapid solidification displaying solute partitioning at the interface, during an experiment to measure the nonequilibrium partition coefficient k, the ratio of solute concentration in the solid at the interface to that in the melt at the interface [1]. The predicted final profile is calculated for a variety of k values and compared to the measured final profile; the best fit determines k.
 
 

By making nanosecond-resolved measurements of the transverse electrical resistance of a thin film on an insulating substrate [2] , as shown in Fig. 2, we have measured solid/liquid interface velocities in silicon during the rapid melting (10-100 m/s) and subsequent solidification (1-10 m/s) induced by pulsed laser melting. This "transient conductance" measurement exploits the thirty-fold increase in electrical conductivity that accompanies the melting of Si. Even though the resistivity change attending the melting of a metal is much less than that in the melting of Si, we have successfully adapted this method [3] to the determination of interface velocities in pulsed laser melting of metallic alloys [4,5] . 
 
 

Fig. 2. Transient conductance measurement and equivalent DC circuit. Knowledge of resistivities of individual phases permits us to determine the instantaneous melt depth from a measurement of the instantaneous film resistance.
 
 

When a rapid phase transformation occurs, the interface velocity v is the single most important variable to characterize in the process. Many other phenomena such as the interfacial undercooling, the extension of solubility, and the stability of a planar interface are explicit functions of v. The ability to measure it, rather than merely to estimate it from heat flow calculations, has been a significant step forward in quantifying these phenomena, permitting the correct theoretical ideas to be separated from the incorrect. We have been applying this method to rapid alloy solidification following pulsed laser melting in order to provide an accurate characterization of phase, composition, and microstructure selection. It has contributed substantially to the development of a fundamental understanding of the principles of nonequilibrium processing. We have further refined this technique so that we can measure the temperature of this rapidly moving interface [7-9], as shown in Fig. 3. 
 
 

Fig. 3Measurement of velocity-undercooling function. Top circuit measures interface velocity as in Fig. 2. This is built on top of a thin Pt layer which never melts, the resistance of which tells us the temperature of the Pt layer. Because this is quite close to the interface and because we know exactly where and at what rate the latent heat is being dumped, we can calculate the correction (DTcorr) fairly well, permitting a determination of the temperature of the interface itself, or its undercooling (DTu).
 
 

Details about our accomplishments can be found in a recent review article [6] which can be downloaded in pdf format
 
 

Currently, Paul Sanders, Michael Aziz, and Frans Spaepen are trying to apply the transient conductance technique and the time-resolved temperature-measurement technique, to measure the temperature of homogeneous crystal nucleation from undercooled liquid silicon. Such a measurement is needed to resolve a controversy in the interpretation of other nucleation experiments.
 
 

These techniques can also be used to measure liquid-phase diffusivities [10]. They are particularly useful for high melting-point materials, where the diffusivity is notoriously difficult to measure by any other means.
 
 

References :

1. R. Reitano, P.M. Smith and M.J. Aziz, "Solute Trapping of Group III, IV and V Elements in Silicon by Aperiodic Stepwise Growth Mechanism", J. Appl. Phys. 76, 1518 (1994).

2. M.O. Thompson, G.J. Galvin, J.W. Mayer, P.S. Peercy and R.B. Hammond, Appl. Phys. Lett. 42, 445 (1983).

3. J.Y. Tsao, S.T. Picraux, P.S. Peercy and M.O. Thompson, Appl. Phys. Lett. 48, 278 (1986).

4. H.A. Atwater, J.A. West, P.M. Smith, M.J. Aziz, J.Y. Tsao, P.S. Peercy and M.O. Thompson, "Time-Resolved Measurements of Solidification and Undercooling in Metals and Alloys", Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 157, 369 (1990).

5. P.M. Smith and M.J. Aziz, "Solute Trapping in Aluminum Alloys", Acta Metall. Mater. 42, 3515 (1994).

6. M.J. Aziz, "Interface Attachment Kinetics in Alloy Solidification", Metallurgical & Materials Transactions A 27, 671-686 (1996).

7. D.P. Brunco, J.A. Kittl, C.E. Otis, P.M. Goodwin, M.O. Thompson and M.J. Aziz, "Time-resolved Temperature Measurements During Pulsed Laser Irradiation Using Thin Film Metal Thermistors", Review of Scientific Instruments 64, 2615-2623 (1993).

8. J.A. Kittl, M.J. Aziz, D.P. Brunco and M.O. Thompson, "Absence of Solute Drag in Solidification", Applied Physics Letters 64, 2359 (1994).

9. J.A. Kittl, M.J. Aziz, D.P. Brunco and M.O. Thompson, "Nonequilibrium Partitioning During Rapid Solidification of Si-As Alloys", Journal of Crystal Growth 148, 172-182 (1995).

10. N. Isono, P.M. Smith, D. Turnbull, and M.J. Aziz, "Anomalous Diffusion of Fe in Liquid Al Measured by the Pulsed Laser Technique", Metallurgical & Materials Transactions A 27, 725-730 (1996).




Michael Aziz