Stress vs. Chemistry in Nanoscale Evolution

last updated 12/3/2000
Optoelectronic devices such as the Vertical Cavity Surface Emitting Laser (Fig. 1: VCSEL, from National Nanotechnology Initiative literature) are revolutionizing communications technology. This device can be made only because of the very precise control scientists have obtained over the synthesis, organization, and uniformity of nanometer-thick films. Future optoelectronic devices will rely on the synthesis, organization, and uniformity of nanoscale materials in two and three dimensions. An example of such a material is the array of "quantum dots" of Ge on Si shown in Fig. 2a. A blow-up of a single such quantum dot is shown in Fig. 2(b). We are currently trying to understand the configurational forces and fundamental materials transport laws governing the formation, and stability of nanoscale features such as these, and much work remains to be done before we can make such features with sufficient precision and reliability for technological applications in mass production.

Fig. 2. (a) Ge on Si Nanodot array, topographical image from G. Medeiros-Ribeiro et al., Phys. Rev. B 58, 3533 (1998). (b) Single quantum dot image from HP research labs, G. Medeiros-Ribiero et al.,via National Nanotechnology Initiative literature.

One complicating feature in the formation of most semiconductor quantum dots is the currently unpredictable interaction of chemistry (i.e. the dots and the substrate have different chemical compositions) and elasticity (i.e., the elastic strain energy that inevitably arises when one tries to grow a material with one characteristic interatomic spacing on top of a material with a slightly different spacing). We have now succeeded in uniquely isolating, and attacking separately, the effects of chemistry and of elasticity by externally loading pure Si mechanically, thereby eliminating the "chemistry" contribution (see publication #106 and #124). We find that tensile and compressive stress affect growth differently: compression makes dots grow and tension makes them flatten out (Fig. 3), contrary to previously published theories.


Fig. 3. Cross-section TEM of pure Si grown by Solid Phase epitaxy under externally imposed elastic stress. (a) Initial corrugated interface, fabricated by X-ray lithography, amplifies (b) under compressive stress and decays (c)under tensile stress.

A new model for the stress effect alone, which does not yet incorporate the effects of chemistry, has been developed (see publications #123 and #128) to predict the conditions under which dots will grow or flatten out, depending on the magnitude and sign of the strain (e ); the deviation from equilibrium (G-tilde), and a material-specific parameter called the activation strain (V-tilde) (Fig. 4). This model is expected to be able to predict the initial stages of quantum dot growth or shrinkage for a wide variety of materials grown by a wide variety of methods.

Fig. 4. Predicted stability map of nanoscale surface features. Boundaries between regimes of stable planar growth and unstable nanodot amplification (due to either what we call the "AT mechanism" or the "BC mechanism", see publication #128), shift with increasing driving free energy G-tilde for growth. For big enough in magnitude (W is the atomic volume and the activation strain V*11 is a measure of the stress effect on the interface mobility, see links at bottom), the elastic strain energy effect commonly studied is insignificant compared to the effect we have discovered of stress on mobility.  T-tilde is the normalized temperature.

Related research descriptions:
The activation strain tensor:  explanation, experiment, and theory (1997)
Self-organization of nanoscale features (2000)