News & Events
The amount of methane gas escaping from the ground during the long cold period in the Arctic each year and entering Earth’s atmosphere is likely much higher than estimated by current climate change models, concludes a major new study led by San Diego State University (SDSU) and a multi-institutional team of researchers.
Scientists from SDSU, NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL), the Harvard John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences (SEAS), the University of Montana, and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, found that far more methane is escaping from Arctic tundra during the cold months when the soil surface is frozen (generally from September through May), and from upland tundra, than climate modelers previously believed. In fact, the researchers found that at least half of the annual methane emissions occur in the cold months, and that drier, upland tundra can be larger emitters of methane than wet tundra. The finding challenges critical assumptions in current global climate models. The results are published today in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS).
Methane is a potent greenhouse gas that intensifies atmospheric warming and is approximately 25 times more potent per molecule than carbon dioxide over a 100-year period. Methane trapped in the Arctic tundra comes primarily from microbial decomposition of organic matter in soil that thaws seasonally. This methane naturally seeps out of the soil over the course of the year, but scientists worry that climate change could lead to the release of even larger emissions from organic matter that is currently stabilized in a deep, frozen soil layer called permafrost.
Over the past several decades, scientists have used specialized instruments to accurately measure methane emissions in the Arctic and incorporated those results into global climate models. However, almost all of these measurements have been obtained during the Arctic’s short summer. The region’s long, brutal cold period, which accounts for between 70 and 80 percent of the year, has been largely “overlooked and ignored,” according to SDSU’s Walter Oechel. Most researchers, he said, figured that because the ground is frozen solid during the cold months, methane emissions practically shut down for the winter.
“Virtually all the climate models assume there’s no or very little emission of methane when the ground is frozen,” Oechel said. “That assumption is incorrect.”
Virtually all the climate models assume there’s no or very little emission of methane when the ground is frozen. That assumption is incorrect.
The water trapped in the soil doesn’t freeze completely at zero degrees Celsius, he explained. The top layer of the ground, known as the active layer, thaws in the summer and refreezes in the winter, and it experiences a kind of sandwiching effect as it freezes. When temperatures are right around zero degrees Celsius—the so-called “zero curtain”—the top and bottom of the active layer begin to freeze, while the middle remains insulated. Microorganisms in this unfrozen middle layer continue to break down organic matter and emit methane many months into the Arctic’s cold period.
Just how much methane is emitted during the Arctic winter? To find out, the research team relied on both ground-based and airborne measurements. SDSU contributors Oechel and Donatella Zona measured fluxes at tundra sites, while Harvard SEAS team members, Steven Wofsy, Abbott Lawrence Rotch Professor of Atmospheric and Environmental Science, and Research Associate Róisín Commane, analyzed data collected from the JPL aircraft flying above the Arctic.
Oechel and Zona operated five sampling towers measuring fluxes of methane, continuously year-round above the Arctic Circle in Alaska. The researchers recorded methane emissions from these sites over two summer-fall-winter cycles between June 2013 and January 2015. It was an arduous task requiring highly specialized instruments that had to operate continuously and autonomously through extreme cold for months at a time. They developed a de-icing system that eliminated biases in the measurement and that was only activated when needed to maintain operation of the instruments down to minus 40 degrees Celsius.
After analyzing the data, the research team found that a major portion of methane emissions during the cold season were observed when temperatures hovered near the zero curtain.
“This is extremely relevant for the Arctic ecosystem, as the zero curtain period continues from September until the end of December, lasting as long or longer than the entire summer season,” said Zona, the study’s first author. “These results are opposite of what modelers have been assuming, which is that the majority of the methane emissions occur during the warm summer months while the cold-season methane contribution is nearly zero.”
Surprisingly, the researchers also found that during the cold season, methane emissions were higher at the drier, upland tundra sites than at wetland sites, contradicting yet another longstanding assumption about Arctic methane emissions. Upland tundra was previously assumed to be a negligible contributor of methane, Zona said.To test whether the site-specific sampling was representative of methane emissions across the Arctic, the researchers compared their results to measurements recorded during aircraft flights over the region made by NASA’s Carbon in Arctic Reservoirs Vulnerability Experiment (CARVE).
“CARVE flights were designed to cover as much of the year as feasible,” said CARVE Principal Investigator Charles Miller of JPL. “It was a challenging undertaking, involving hundreds of hours of flying in difficult conditions.”
The data from the ground-based sites were well aligned with the larger-scale aircraft measurements.
“CARVE aircraft measurements show that large areas of Arctic tundra and boreal forest continue to emit methane to the atmosphere at high rates, long after the surface soil freezes,” said Commane of Harvard SEAS, who helped acquire and analyze the aircraft data. "Aircraft sampling allows us to reach a much larger area than any of the individual towers. As we flew across the snow-covered North Slope, seeing methane fluxes similar to the measurements from the towers was an unexpected and exciting result."
To complement and verify the on-the-ground study, the University of Montana’s John Kimball and his team used satellite microwave sensor measurements to develop regional maps of surface water cover, including the timing, extent and duration of seasonal flooding and drying of the region’s wetlands.
“We were able to use the satellite data to show that the big methane-emitting areas, which were being measured by the on-the-ground instruments, were in the drier tundra,” Kimball said.
The researchers stressed the importance for climate modelers to have good baseline data on methane emissions and to adjust their models to account for Arctic cold-season methane emissions as well as the contributions of non-wetland areas, including upland tundra.
“It is now time to work more closely with climate modelers and assure these observations are used to improve model predictions, and refine our prediction of the global methane budget,” Zona said.
It is particularly important, Oechel added, for models to get methane output right because the gas is a major driver of atmospheric warming.
“If you don’t have the mechanism right, you won’t be able to make future predictions based on these conditions,” he said.
Wofsy added: "Now that we know how important the winter is to the methane budget, we are working to determine the long-term trends in greenhouse emissions from tundra and their sensitivity to winter warming."
This research has been funded by the Arctic System Science Program, Division of Polar Programs of the National Science Foundation (NSF), by the Carbon in Arctic Reservoirs Vulnerability Experiment (CARVE), an Earth Ventures (EV-1) investigation, under contract with the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, and by the DOE (DE-SC005160).
Cutting-edge science delivered direct to your inbox.
Join the Harvard SEAS mailing list.